This is default featured post 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Showing posts with label Get Inspired. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Get Inspired. Show all posts

  Easy way to develop your whole brain

Mind Map is not about developing only right side brain.
It also developing your whole brain
Let's read this :





Until recently, I would immediately have shouted: ‘Whole Brain!‘.
What was your response?
Isn’t it strange how quickly we can label and judge once we know the way? I spent a large portion of my adult life learning how to learn. I chose a career, Information Technology, that requires constant learning just to keep up, never mind staying ahead of the pack.
My discovery of Mind Maps and Mind Mapping helped make this journey easier and more fun. In the process I started priding myself smugly as a ‘whole brain’ thinker.
Mind Maps combined my left brain and my right brain in problem solving and thinking. I’ve written quite a bit of it on MindMapTutor.com. One of my articles, The Mind’s unknown potential, highlights this, as well as the great power of the brain.
The best feature of a Mind Map is that it combines both the left brain and the right brain in both its creation and use. It naturally uses the left brain because it is structured and has words. It naturally uses the right brain, as it is a picture and multidimensional.
After I discovered the wonders of Mind Mapping and started to use Mind Maps, I began to judge those that didn’t and silently labelled people right brained or left brained, based on the way they appeared to think.
I was so smugly ‘whole brained’ that I started to see the ‘others’ as inferior, no matter how good or successful they were.
What I failed to see at the time, was the fact that ‘whole brained’ also had its deficiencies in most cases.
In fact, if you are on the fringes of left or right brain thinking, you could develop more whole brain thinking skills much easier than someone at the extreme end of either left or right brain thinking. You don’t have to be good at anything and still be ‘whole brained’.
It may be interesting to note that most geniuses lean heavily to one side.
  • The top scientists, mathematicians and programmers are very left brained.
  • The top musicians, artists and designers are very right brained.
Can we therefore say that being very left-brained or very right-brained such a bad thing?

Right brain prejudice

Even though whole brained thinking is believed to be better, the western school curriculum traditionally favoured the left-brained individual. Western society therefore generally rewards left-brained people more than right-brained people.
Many of the menial jobs don’t require any innovation or creativity from the person executing the task. I call this the the ‘factory mentality’. You are working on a production line and need to do as you are told, repetititively and consistently.
It is unfortunate that so many people not working on production lines have the same mentality. They are in a rut at work, simply doing the same thing over and over. Energy and innovation is nowhere to be found.
In many cases, this suits the business owners and bosses, as they need people to ‘do as they are told’. Many managers are threatened by energetic and innovative subordinates. They suppress energy and innovation instead of ecouraging and nurturing it.
Innovation and creativity are often punished instead of rewarded.
The innovative and creative people therefore end up as artists, musicians, etc. Or they enter naturally right brained ‘accepted’ professions such as graphic design.

Overcoming the prejudice

Last week, I wrote about the six thinking hats of Edward de Bono. In his framework of thinking, there is definitely a place for creativity. Do you remember which hat symbolises this?
When wearing this hat, you are encouraged to be as creative as possible. If you are a left brained manager, you must ensure the the more right brained individuals get a chance to express themselves in the best possible way.
Right brained thinkers are key elements in a brainstorming session. Without them, you will get dull, flat, unimaginative solutions. In fact, you may not get solutions as all. You may just dig a hole and get deeper and deeper into the problem.
By using Mind Maps and Mind Mapping to capture and structure the right brain ideas, you naturally build a more whole brained view of the situation.

So can one still say that whole brained is better?

We can, if we could develop both right brained and left brained qualities to the same level of extreme excellence.
While there are some geniuses that have achieved this, it remains a rare exception.
Many leaders tend to be more whole brained, as they can tap into both left brain and right brain when thinking and solving problems. They also have the confidence and wisdom to pull in the extreme left brain or the extreme right brain individual when necessary.
They realise that in order to be successful, they have to tap into experts in both halves. By doing this, they will get the best whole brain solution.

So what should we do?

  • If you are left brained, do more right brain activities and use Mind Maps
  • If you are right brained, do more left brain activities and use Mind Maps
  • If you are whole brained, start stretching the limits of both halves…and use Mind Maps
As you can see, Mind Maps can assist you no matter where you are on the left brain, right brain spectrum. Left brainers should encourage creativity and innovation in both themselves and others. Right brainers should welcome the structure and order of left brainers to enable them to maximise the effects of their creativity.
A thinking framework like the six thinking hats allows individuals and groups to ‘wear both hats’ without prejudice.
So, have read the article, many of us believe that, using mind map only developing your right side brain, which involves in creativity, colour and such, but mind map is about stimulating your whole brain.
Isn't this information does not realise you that
using MIND MAP
IS ALL ABOUT AWESOME
Hello
now let us go through a talk from tony buzan



<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MlabrWv25qQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

  Interview


Following on from the interview with Tony Buzan, members of KnowledgeBoard sister site TrainingZonedelved deeper into his psyche by posing some questions to the mind mapping guru. What are your thoughts?

Jean Marrapodi:  Like many, I have used mind mapping for years and love the fluid nature of it. I have found that some really dislike it from a conceptual base. Do you think there is any alignment with a particular type of individual preferring mapping in light of preferences revealed through theories like Gardner's Multiple Intelligences or those revealed by any of the plethora of other learning style models? Or do you think those who prefer mind mapping over traditional, linear thinking models are just early adopters and it's a change management issue?
Tony Buzan: It is my firm belief that every brain is, by nature, a mind mapper! The fact that a baby learns a language is evidence confirming that it must learn by multi-sensual images and their radiating associations. I also believe that everyone contains the full set of multiple intelligences (I support Howard in this) and that the mind map, being a multiple intelligence tool, is once again a natural extension of these theories.
The reason why some people 'really dislike it from a conceptual base' is the fear or panic reaction from those who have been so inculcated with the 'fact' that linear monochromatic and listing thinking is the 'proper way'. To put it in the terms of Matthias Alexander, the inventor of the Alexander Technique, it is akin to 'Debauched Kinesthesia' in which the body, because it has been conditioned to adopt incorrect postural attitudes, believes that when it is bent it is straight and aligned, and that when it is straight and aligned it is off-balance.
So I agree with your final comment/question: those who prefer mind mapping are the 'early adopters' and it is a change management issue. Happily, it is now estimated that approaching half a billion people are using Mind Maps and that at any given second of any given day, at least five Mind Maps are being created somewhere in the world. Thank you for being one of their supporters! 
I am planning to visit the USA in the first two weeks of November, and note that both Bill Gates and Al Gore are among that half billion! I have also heard it rumoured that President Obama is also a mind mapper – do you know if this is so?

Hannah Harris: I have used mind mapping successfully to help me with my note-taking while studying and to come up with new ideas at work. I still prefer to do it freehand as I find it allows me to be more spontaneous. There are so many electronic versions of mind mapping software now though, which I am sure must have some benefits. What is your favoured approach - freehand or electronic and do you have any tips for making software work as well or better than freehand drawing?
Tony Buzan: Yes, like you, I prefer to do my mind maps freehand - they are more spontaneous, and because I love the tactile feel of the paper and the pen/brush flowing. However, computers are catching up fast!
Ever since I invented Mind Maps, I have dreamed of matching the human brain with the computer brain, facilitating the computer brain to speak in the language of the human brain. I worked on most of the major pre-Mind Map software and although they slowly progressed, they were always fundamentally 'rough drafts' - they were too angular, too rigidly mechanical, not organic, not artistic, not aesthetically pleasing, and not really human. Apart from that they were fine!
In 2008, my dream actually came true. Chris Griffiths, a computer expert and educationalist, said he wanted to gather a team and, as in the Manhattan Project, laser-direct a group of incredible individuals to cracking an 'insoluble problem'. He and his team succeeded. The product is new, is named iMindMap and allows you to produce mind maps that look as if they have been done by human hand. The unique features also include massive storage capacity, instantaneous access, ability to move entire branches from place to place, ability to change the size and colour of any branch, and the ability to intricately cross-reference the Mind Maps in your database
You can download this new software (which for the very reason behind your questions is now my only approved software) at www.imindmap.com. You can play with it free for seven days.

John Lorriman: I regularly quote something from an article which you wrote in one of the Skandia Intellectual Capital Supplements a few years ago: "The potentially most revolutionary discovery is that humans in general do not use 40% of the brain's capacity, as we thought in the 1950s. Not even 10%, as we thought in the 1980s. Recent research has revealed that we do not even use one per cent of our brain's capacity."
I have always wondered what this research was, and would much like to know more about how and where this research was done and any further relevant details.
Tony Buzan: Thank you for both reading and understanding the Skandia Intellectual Capital Supplement. Coincidentally, I had the full set of those issues beside me when I received your question as I am using them as source material for my new book on Mind Maps in Business. To clarify the issues on the 'percentage use' of the human brain, the reference is specifically to memory, creativity and learning. The researches in the field are summarised quite regularly in both New Scientist magazine and Scientific American.
In 1995 New Scientist had a front page feature under the title 'The Universe in Your Head' in which it pointed out that a number of thoughts available to the average human brain was greater than the number of atoms in the sidereal universe. Before that, Pyotra Anokhin, Russia's leading neuroscientist, had calculated that the minimum number of thoughts that the brain could physically make (he called them 'acts of intelligence') was the number one, followed by ten and one half a million kilometres of typewritten noughts. More recently, in 2006, in the new magazine Scientific American Mind, the front cover feature on creativity quoted 'How Brilliance Arises in Every One of Us', going on to say that the untapped potential of the human brain was the world's greatest resource. As you might imagine, I thoroughly agree!
My own field researches have come up with similar results. One of my main reasons for forming the World Memory Championships was to demonstrate that the capacity of the average human brain to remember was minimally a hundred times greater than normal performance.
Psychologists at London University who attended the 1994 World Memory Championships in London predicted that no human being would ever in the future history of the human race memorise a once-spoken number of 30 digits or longer. Each added digit to a spoken number compounds the difficulty and complexity of instantaneous recall. In last year's World Memory Championship in Bahrain, Dr Gunter Karsten memorised a spoken number at twice the rate of that stipulated by the psychologists, of 202 digits, and he was able to recall it five hours later! This is an improvement in capacity of thousands of times.
Similarly in creativity, the average number of ideas that any individual can think of for the use of and/or associations with any given object runs out - despite them being given as much time as they wish - at less than 20. Any trained mind mapper/creative thinker can continue to generate such ideas for one object every minute of their waking lives for their entire life.

If you would like to pose a question on mind mapping or any other areas of KM, please visit our discussion forums or comment below.

Details

Author:
louise druce
Publisher:
KnowledgeBoard
Date:
04-Feb-09
Categories:
KM Strategy and Vision, Tacit Knowledge 
Sections:
Home , KnowledgeBank , News